The official discussion of Futurama thread

The discussion of Futurama here from Leela to Fry to Bender to Zoidberg.










Ha, just kidding about the Zoidberg part.

Wimmy wam woo wazzle.

DO WANT.

I keep forgetting to update the main picture, urgh.

this is bad probably

~Sgt-Jay~ wrote:

this is bad probably

KVETCH KVETCH KVETCH! I waited a good seven years for a new season so I'll take what I can freaking get. Sorry if I seem snippy but FUTURAMA! YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY!

Man, please don't suck, please don't suck, please don't suck...
Basically, I'm worried that this will end up like post-revival Family Guy.

Well, okay, it won't be that bad, but it could still end up being like modern Simpsons episodes...
I mean, that's juts kinda what I'm seeing in the promotional material, is all...


Then again, it will still probably better than most shows on TV, so...
DANG IT THURSDAY, HURRY UP!

Descriptor wrote:

Man, please don't suck, please don't suck, please don't suck...
Basically, I'm worried that this will end up like post-revival Family Guy.

Hey, Family Guy was somewhat good during the first two seasons of revival. Then went to ****. BUT that's because they had gathered such a large fan base, that they were able to stop trying and still have success. (THEY MAKE JOKES ABOUT THE SHOW NOT BEING GOOD ANYMORE SO THAT IS THE ONLY LOGICAL REASON)

Laddies & Gentlemen. The dawn of Futurama is upon us.

Apparently its not very good.

derp

DERP

DERPPPPPP

Soooooooooooon... SOOOOOOOOOOOOON!!!!

IGN said it was crap

A bit like the movies then. Probably to much fan service and not enough lawls.

Who cares? We get a whole season. Doesn't matter if the first was crap. I can't wait to see them all.

what if theyre all crap

I'm not optimistic. Its by the same guys who made the last 5 years of Simpsons.

Hey drug-monkeys, what are you on? They gave it a Good score. Where did you read "crap"?

"It's too early to tell if "Rebirth" is, in fact, the return of the Futurama we know and love, but it's a worthy first episode after such a long time without episodic stories."

You guys suck. Here I thought you were telling the truth.

Lame.

It says "it's a worthy first episode", and they payed to get early access to it. So basically, its crap.

Stickman wrote:

It says "it's a worthy first episode", and they payed to get early access to it. So basically, its crap.

*sniiiiiiiiiiifffffffffffffffff*

Duuuuuuuuude, you're totally right dude! That makes perfect sense! It's not what they wrote, it's what they DIDN'T WRITE! DUDE!

Dude.

Jesus JKR, shut up.

I don't really give a crap what IGN says personally, they're often full of crap. I'll watch the whole season whether it's bad or good.

if ign give a tv show 7.5 /10

it means its crap

Okay, everyone, calm down.

First off, I have never know the TV section of IGN to give logical numbers to it's reviews, so 7.5 really means nothing.
Secondly, I heard that the 2nd episode is a lot more like the original run, so it's prolly too soon to say anything.
So just calm down, sheesh....